-
Answer to the Archbishop of York’s Assertion of TEC Orthodoxy
-
TEC Legal Transparency Petition 4,000 Signatures and Growing
-
A Look Back at the ACN Council Meeting
-
Making Sense of the Soup
Answer to the
Archbishop of York’s Assertion of TEC Orthodoxy
By The Rev. Canon David C.
Anderson, President and CEO, American Anglican Council
Source: The
Church of England Newspaper
, Week of August 3 Edition
Date: August 2, 2007
Archbishop of York John
Sentamu has been quoted as saying, “…I haven’t found that in ECUSA (sic)
or in Canada, where I was recently, they have any doubts in their
understanding of God which is very different from anybody. What they
have quarreled about is the nature of sexual ethics.”
John Sentamu hasn’t looked
or listened hard enough. The battle, at least in North America, is over
core doctrine and belief: who Jesus is and what authority Holy Scripture
has. Although in a brief article there is not ample space for a
full-length dissertation on the extent of the problem, let some of the
North American and especially Episcopal Church leaders speak for
themselves.
In an interview with TIME
magazine, Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori remarked, “We who practice
the Christian tradition understand him (Jesus) as our vehicle to the
divine. But for us to assume that God could not act in other ways is, I
think, to put God in an awfully small box.” When CNN questioned Jefferts
Schori about an afterlife, she opined, “What happens after you die? I
would ask you that question. But what’s important about your life? What
is it that has made you unique individual? What is the passion that has
kept you getting up every morning and engaging the world? There are
hints within that about what it is that continues after you die.”
Bishop John Bruno, Diocesan
of Los Angeles, in my presence and speaking to a church gathering said
Jesus was a savior, his savior, but not the only one and other religions
had their own way to God. His predecessor, Bishop Frederick Borsch had
said much the same thing, also in my presence, cautioning that people in
other religions had their own way to God and should not be evangelized
with the Christian Gospel.
Bishop John Spong, retired
Bishop of Newark remarked, “I would choose to loathe rather than to
worship a deity who required the sacrifice of his son.” From Canada,
Bishop Michael Ingham of New Westminster predicted “The next battle will
move beyond sexuality to focus on the exclusivity of Christianity and
the need to recognize Jesus as a way, but not the only way.” The problem
for much of the Episcopal Church leadership is they do not hold an
ancient and Anglican view of Jesus Christ.
On the topic of Holy
Scripture, the Bishop of Pennsylvania, the Rt. Rev. Charles Bennison has
remarked, “We wrote the Bible and we can rewrite it. We have rewritten
the Bible many times.” The Episcopal Diocese of Utah stated, “Judgments
about ethics by appeal to the Holy Scriptures alone are foreign to our
Anglican traditions, which have always included other sources of
authority in their deliberations… There is no single biblical morality…”
Some may wish to say that
these voices are isolated instances but not representative of the core
leadership of TEC. The remarks here included are from the Presiding
Bishop of TEC, a bishop of one of the largest Episcopal dioceses and his
predecessor, a retired senior bishop of TEC, a bishop of a major east
coast TEC diocese, and a former dean of the officially established TEC
seminary in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Hardly voices on the margin of
TEC, their voices and other leaders who have said similar things have
gone unchallenged from the main body of the Episcopal Church. Note also
that at General Convention 2006, the House of Deputies refused to
consider Resolution D-058 which declared the Episcopal Church’s
“unchanging commitment to Jesus Christ as the Son of God, the only name
by which any person may be saved,” and which acknowledged evangelism as
“the solemn responsibility placed upon us to share Christ with all
persons when we hear His words, ‘I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
No one comes to the Father except through me’ (John 14:6).”
The Episcopal disdain for
absolute and historic beliefs about who Jesus is and what he
accomplished, together with views on Holy Scripture that contradict the
Anglican formularies are carried over into other areas where liturgy and
practice are built on these views. Most of the liberal/progressive
Episcopal dioceses tolerate on a wide scale fully open communion to all
present, regardless of being baptized or not, and regardless of whether
they are Christian, Jewish, agnostic, animist, Muslim, Hindu or
Buddhist. There is a pervasive disbelief in sin and the need for
atonement, disbelief in the unique and essential person and work of
Jesus Christ, and a widespread unease in using the historic Trinitarian
formulary or ‘Lord’ because it is seen as narrow, sexist, and exclusive.
Formularies such as Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer substitute for
Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The mantra of faith for TEC is openness,
toleration, inclusiveness, and progression into new ideas and new ways
of looking at God.
So what about the orthodoxy
of the Episcopal Church that Archbishop Sentamu assures us of? One of
their own leaders puts it very well. The Very Rev. William Rankin,
former Dean of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, remarked about heresy, “Heresy implies orthodoxy, and we
have no such thing in the Episcopal Church.”
TEC Legal
Transparency Petition 4,000 Signatures and Growing
The American Anglican
Council's (AAC) recent online petition received over 4,000 signatures in
its first week and is still gaining support. The TEC Legal Transparency
Petition calls for The Episcopal Church (TEC) to state how much money it
has spent since 2004 on litigation against individuals and parishes and
to make public the source of the money for said litigation. Within
hours of its posting the petition reached the 1,000 signature mark. If
you want to sign the petition and haven't had the chance, you can still
go to
www.showmethemoney.kintera.org
and sign. You will not be solicited or e-mailed if you sign. The
petition will be used to shed light on a controversial issue that seems
to have eluded the headlines and the nightly news stories.
A Look Back at the
ACN Council Meeting
By Robert Lundy, AAC Communications Assistant
The Anglican Communion Network
(ACN) continued its commitment to unity within the body of Christ and to
building a “Biblical, Missionary, and United” Anglicanism in North
America at its recent Annual Council meeting July 30-31 in Bedford,
Texas. The two-day conference included delegations representing Network
dioceses, convocations and the Anglican Global Mission Partners. The
Most Rev. Greg Venables, Archbishop of the Southern Cone, was the Bible
teacher for the event and other official guests and observers from
around the Anglican world were present.
The ACN, sometimes referred to
as “The Network,” made significant steps toward a stronger and more
united orthodox movement in the
U.S.
The council ratified a Common
Cause theological statement. (Common Cause is an alliance of ten
orthodox organizations in the Anglican tradition.) The document states
that the ratifying partners "believe and confess Jesus Christ to be the
Way, the Truth, and the Life." It goes on to say "no one comes to the
Father but by Him."
Along with the Common Cause
theological statement, the council ratified the federating articles of
the Common Cause Partners. Describing the federating articles,
Bishop-elect John Guernsey said they are “a step forward for Common
Cause that allows the constituent partners to retain their identity and
autonomy while forming a more coherent and accountable structure. None
of the groups disappear and none of the groups stop their gospel
mission… Yet we are forming a more coherent whole.”
An amendment to the ACN’s
bylaws was approved which states, “Nothing in the charter or bylaws
shall be interpreted as requiring submission to the Constitution of the
Episcopal Church by affiliates of this Network who are not themselves
members of the Episcopal Church."
Before ending the conference,
the delegates also approved a resolution stating their “unconditional
commitment to the unanimous urging of the Primates of the Anglican
Communion that all existing litigation between The Episcopal Church
(TEC) and those who have left TEC or are otherwise engaged in litigation
involving claims of TEC, be suspended.” The resolution, passed on July
31, went on to declare the Network’s willingness on behalf of its
affiliates and partners “to engage in mediation” with TEC to find a
mutually-agreeable way forward.
Making Sense of the
Soup
If you are confused by the
seemingly endless supply of Anglican acronyms don't worry, you are not
alone. Many are frustrated when trying to make sense of the virtual
alphabet soup of orthodox Anglican organizations. In an effort to clear
up the consternation, the AAC has created a simple diagram of who is in
the Common Cause Partners. Click here
to view the diagram.