|
Friday, June
13, 2008 "As the mountains
surround Jerusalem, so the Lord surrounds His people from this time forth
and forever."
Psalm 125:2 NKJV
-
A message from Bishop David Anderson
-
Event: Steadfast in Faith
Lecture series at Newport Beach
- Albany: Convention passes canons banning
same-gender marriages, blessings
- California: Bishop Andrus affirms
Supreme Court ruling, issues guidelines for marriages
- England: Religious engineering: a
dangerous game
- Canada: Alberta Pastor Ordered to
Publicly Apologize and Remain Silent on Homosexuality
_________________________
A message from Bishop David
Anderson
Beloved in Christ,
Last week I wrote that the orthodox Anglicans seemed to be pressed between
Islamic militancy on the one hand and a homosexual agenda on the other, both
of which are aided and abetted by some governments. I would like to discuss
several more examples of this situation.
Since the California Supreme Court
established, in effect, homosexual marriage in California, Episcopal
dioceses in California are rushing to establish policy guidelines. Many
revisionist parishes are demanding the right to conduct full-scale gay
marriages, and until their diocese permits this, are declaring that they
won't do any religious marriages for heterosexual couples, but will only do
blessings of civil marriages for them as well as gay couples. They insist on
absolute parity between Adam and Eve on one hand and Adam and Steve on the
other. Who is in charge of this insane asylum, anyway?
In England, the Earl of Devon banned gay
marriages at his castle and walked into a hornets' nest of homosexual
push-back. Although he has decided that there will be no hosting of civil
marriage ceremonies at all, for any couples, the homosexual activists are
trying to have his ancient castle's inheritance tax exemption revoked
because it isn't gay-friendly. But wait, it gets worse in Canada.
A Christian pastor in Canada has been
ordered to apologize to a gay man and pay for the expenses of the
complainant and a witness who came to testify at a hearing. Apparently the
pastor had written remarks critical of homosexual behavior in a letter to
the editor of a local paper. A gay activist complained, the letter was
branded "hate speech" and he was ordered to make restitution. The fact that
the letter was submitted to a public forum, and yet one man whose feelings
were hurt could file a claim, AND WIN, says that truly the lunatics are in
charge of the asylum. I suppose that answers my rhetorical question in
paragraph two above.
If, in the wonderful world of the internet,
one person writes something in one country and posts it to the internet, and
it is reposted or available almost anywhere in the world, is the writer to
be found liable in any country in the world where someone is offended?
Perhaps the gay activists are already clapping their hands and can't wait to
find a country and a court to bring some of us up for a trial. But this
sword of insanity cuts both directions. Some gay activist may be advocating
over the internet certain freedoms and behaviors that are illegal in some
countries. If he or she were to be reported to the authorities by someone
offended in such a country, and then tried for those writings, he/she could
just as easily be at risk.
Now to the Muslim side of the equation. The
Church of England Newspaper (CEN), on page one in an article titled
"Government Warned Over Sidelining of Christians" by Toby Cohen, gives fair
warning to the government and advises that the government must act on the
recommendations of a recent report on Government and Church relations. Then
the CEN, on page 11, continues in their Comment section with an article
exposing the anti-Christian and pro-Muslim policy of the Brown government.
This article helps to explain why things are getting as bad as they are in
the UK, and who is behind it. Hazel Blears, speaking for the government,
says that to sideline Christianity is a "common sense policy." The full text
is absolutely worth reading.
One might think that all of this Islamic
advancement promoted by governmental entities seems like a bad dream, but it
has gone so far in some instances that there is no waking up from it. In
Irvine, California, at the University of California Irvine, which is a
prestigious and well-regarded American university, the university
authorities and campus police seem bent on creating an environment that will
eventually extinguish their own culture. In a May 22, 2008 article by
Jonathan Constantine Movroydis and Reut Cohen, the extent of the Muslim
Student Union's (MSU) growth and power is documented. The MSU holds several
annual events, at which members unashamedly voice support for terrorist
groups and denounce Israel, America, and the Western world. According to
Movroydis and Cohen, the MSU intimidates other students, especially Jewish
ones, and the campus police are unwilling to intervene.
On a more positive note, in a few days
several of our AAC staff and I will be traveling to Jordan and Israel for
GAFCON. Our staff is assisting in some areas, such as registration, to free
up others to be participants. My wife, MaryAnne and I will be there in two
capacities: representing the American Anglican Council, which is a Common
Cause Partners signatory; and also as a CANA/Nigerian bishop and wife. We
are praying for a lifting of the mist and a clear vision of the preferred
and God-directed future for orthodox Anglicans, as we together face these
two great challenges to Christianity: theological revisionism and Islam.
Blessings and Peace in Jesus Christ,
The Rt. Rev. David C. Anderson, Sr.
President and CEO, American Anglican Council
_________________________
Event: Steadfast in Faith Lecture
Series at Newport Beach
Source: St. James Anglican Church, via email
NEWPORT BEACH, June 12, 2008 – Radio
broadcast veteran Warren Duffy will speak at St. James Church Wednesday,
June 25 at 7 pm on "Who are the 2008 Nicolaitans?" as part of the church's
"Steadfast in Faith" lecture series.
For a decade, afternoon drive-time radio
listeners in Southern California tuned in to hear the daily talk program
"Duffy and Company - Live From L.A." Duffy is a veteran of nearly 50 years
in radio broadcasting. After a stint as the PR Director for the Beach Boys
and a bout with recreational drug use, he returned to his Christian faith.
A complimentary light supper will be
offered at 6 pm. The lecture is free, however a freewill offering will be
received.
_________________________
Albany: Convention passes canons
banning same-gender marriages, blessings
Source:
Episcopal News Service
By Mary Frances Schjonberg
June 10, 2008
The Episcopal Diocese of Albany, meeting
June 6 in its 140th annual convention, passed new canons prohibiting
same-gender blessings and ordaining and licensing only those clergy who are
married to a member of the opposite sex or "celibate and abstinent."
In his address to the convention meeting at
Camp of the Woods in Speculator, New York, Albany Bishop William Love said
the canons "are consistent with past and current diocesan policy and are not
in violation or contradiction" with the Episcopal Church's canons.
The new canons "are not intended to be
divisive, although some have come to see them that way," he said. "But
rather, they are intended to provide clarity, in a time where there is great
confusion within the Episcopal Church as well as the Anglican Communion
concerning marriage and sexual relations outside of the confines of marriage
between a man and women."
He noted that the canons "apply to
everyone, regardless of one's sexual orientation. There is one standard
concerning sexual relations by which we are all called to live. While
recognizing that many heterosexual couples have chosen to engage in sexual
relations outside of marriage, the Church will not bless such unions." ...
The rest of the article may be found at the
link above.
_________________________
California: Bishop Andrus affirms
Supreme Court ruling, issues guidelines for marriages
Diocese of California
website
June 9, 2008
Dear Sisters and Brothers in Christ,
I welcome the ruling of the California
Supreme Court affirming the fundamental right of all people to marry. I am
writing to you now to recommend a path to use this decision to strengthen
our support of our lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered sisters and
brothers, and our continued witness to God's inclusive love.
Clergy and lay leaders in the diocese have
been working for the rights of LGBT people and for their full inclusion in
our Church for more than forty years. Today, we continue to walk a journey
that includes:
- Bringing the witness of our LGBT sisters and brothers to this summer's
Lambeth Conference,
- Combating a ballot initiative this November that will attempt to take away
the rights recently recognized by the California Supreme Court,
- Providing leadership at next summer's General Convention to bring our
marriage practices and theology in line with our fundamental baptismal
theology.
For far too long the onus has fallen on
marginalized people to bear the burden of inequalities that exist within the
Church, and the decision by our state's Supreme Court has given us the
opportunity to level the playing field.
To that end, the Diocese of California
seeks to provide, by advocacy and example, a way forward for The Episcopal
Church so that the marriage of same-sex couples will be a part of our
official marriage rites, without distinction. Although The Episcopal Church
does not have canonical rites for same-sex marriage, it is our goal that all
couples be treated equally by the Church, as they are equally loved by God.
I therefore provide you with the following
pastoral guidelines:
- I urge you to encourage all couples, regardless of orientation, to follow
the pattern of first being married in a secular service and then being
blessed in The Episcopal Church. I will publicly urge all couples to follow
this pattern.
- For now, the three rites approved for trial use under the pastoral
direction of the bishop, adopted by resolution at the 2007 Diocesan
Convention (see appendix), should be commended to all couples (again,
regardless of orientation) to bless secular marriages.
- All marriages should be performed by someone in one of the secular
categories set forth in California Family Code, section 400 (see appendix),
noting that any person in the state of California can be deputized to
perform civil marriages. The proper sphere for Episcopal clergy is the
blessing portion of the marriage.
- The understanding of The Episcopal Church currently is that blessings are
an extension of the pastoral office of the bishop. I ask that you continue
to inform me of all same-sex blessings.
- Couples who have been married under the auspices of the California Supreme
Court ruling must have the same pre-marriage counseling as that required of
any couple seeking marriage or blessing of marriage in The Episcopal Church.
This should be understood as an offering of the Church's support for
marriage.
- I urge Episcopalians, clergy and lay, to volunteer as Deputy Marriage
Commissioners. There are over 4,000 civil same-sex marriages planned in a
short period of time in the city of San Francisco alone and the city is
asking for help in meeting demand. I intend to volunteer for this at my
earliest opportunity.
- This would be one sign of affirmation for the Supreme Court ruling from
our diocese. By city requirement, clergy will not be allowed to wear collars
when presiding at secular marriages. (For more information about how to be
deputized, see the attached appendix.)
- All people receiving blessings of civil marriages in the Diocese of
California are free to use the same degree of publicity (e.g., newspaper
notices).
These are interim measures as the Diocese
of California and The Episcopal Church continue our journey in the context
of this prophetic opportunity provided by the California Supreme Court's
ruling. I have already initiated a process to arrive at a more studied,
permanent answer for Episcopal clergy presiding at same-sex marriages in
this diocese. That process includes the formation of a panel of diocesan
clergy to make recommendations about how to move toward equality of marriage
rites for all people. These recommendations will be discussed across the
diocese resulting in an official diocesan policy.
In the coming days, I will publicly state
my opposition to the initiative to overturn the Supreme Court ruling. The
Diocese of California will publish advertising around June 17 celebrating
the Supreme Court ruling and inviting same-sex couples to our churches for
pre-marital counseling and nourishment in communities of faith.
As always, I welcome your wisdom, your
insights and your input on these matters, and I continue in my commitment to
work for a Church that sees all of God's children through the same eyes that
God does.
Peace,
The Rt. Rev. Marc Handley Andrus
Bishop
_________________________
England: Religious engineering - a
dangerous game
Commentary from the Church of England Newspaper
June 13, 2008, Page 11
So it's official, what this newspaper has
been claiming for some time, that our government has been sidelining
Christianity and promoting Islam - and not at the behest of many Muslims. At
all levels of government, from quangos, to local authorities, to the police,
to Home Office advice on forced marriages, to funding Islamic projects,
education authorities and the headscarfery games, to halal meat foisted on
non-Muslim children, to the gradual strangulation of critical scholarship in
colleges and universities, a whole raft of weird and wonderful legislation
has been passed, in a decade.
A mass expansion of Islamic schools is
planned soon, cementing apartheid in the teeth of the Cantle Report, and
religious hate crime legislation has put a chill factor over freedom of
speech and religious debate. The police have recently told evangelists to
quit an area since it is a Muslim district. And now the government has said
that it has all along very deliberately sought this path, it is no accident,
and at the same time it says that to sideline Christianity is a 'common
sense' policy, in the words of Hazel Blears.
The president of Malaysia has called for
Muslims in the UK to be given even more privileges and rights, using British
colonial history as an excuse - oddly ignoring the far more brutal Islamic
colonisation and religious enforcement never practised by Britain.
The report "Moral, Without a Compass"
published by the Von Hugel Institute has discovered that the government has
deliberately ignored the vast Christian tradition on which all charitable
and welfare work is based in the UK, and thereby buying goodwill from
hardline Islamists. We should ask Ms Blears why there are so many social
crises: youth crime, educational decline, difficulty recruiting to the
caring professions, coarsening of culture, sheer selfishness: hello Ms
Blears - steepling moral decline as Christianity declines in influence.
According to Ms Blears it is government
policy to pour resources into Muslim communities in order to buffer the
effects of radicalisation on young men. New Labour is the party that chose
to invade Iraq, against the advice of all religiously informed agencies,
including this newspaper: we warned that western military power can bring
down a regime, but cannot change a culture. And the government is doing
precisely the same in the UK, it is colluding with hard-line Muslim
ideologues, the source of the problem, and not challenging fundamentalism in
terms of liberal, post-Enlightenment thinking. It has failed to connect with
modern Muslims and is simply allowing very conservative Imams to speak for
'the' Muslim community, as if it were a single unit. As a result, in a
decade, the UK faces a large and growing fundamentalist block claiming the
right to its own legal system, a highly dangerous fragmenting of our once
unified Kingdom. The government is playing with fire.
_________________________
Canada: Alberta Pastor Ordered to
Publicly Apologize and Remain Silent on Homosexuality
Source:
LifeSiteNews
By Tim Waggoner
June 9, 2008
Ottawa - On Friday, the Alberta Human
Rights Commission ordered Alberta pastor Stephen Boissoin to desist from
expressing his views on homosexuality in any sort of public forum. He was
also commanded to pay damages equivalent to $7,000 as a result of the
tribunal's November decision to side with complainant and homosexual
activist Dr. Darren Lund. The tribunal has also called for Boissoin to
personally apologize to Lund via a public statement in the local newspaper.
The remedy order demands the pastor to pay
$5,000 to Lund personally for the "time and energy" he has expended and for
the "ridicule and harassment" he has faced. Combined with that financial
burden, Boissoin must also pay up to $2,000 in expenses to one of Lund's
witness, provided she produces records of such costs.
Boissoin was first hauled before the Human
Rights Commission to answer to a complaint filed by Lund, an assistant
professor at the University of Calgary. Lund made his complaint after
Boissoin published a letter to the editor in the Red Deer Advocate, in which
he denounced homosexuality as immoral and dangerous, and called into
question new gay-rights curricula permeating the province's educational
system. ...
The rest of the article may be found at the
link above.
|